Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3550S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3550S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 2181 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3550S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550S
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - $109.64 vs $135.27
- Up to 12% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 7 2700 - $0.79 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3550S - 167 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550S - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
155
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €121.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3550S | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |