Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1158 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3550 - 129 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-3550 - $87.75 vs $244.95
- Up to 67% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3550 - $0.76 vs $2.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3550 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €271.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
129
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3550 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |