Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3550 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3550 is 2165 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-3550 - $39.15 vs $244.95
- Up to 84% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-3550 - $0.27 vs $1.7 per FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Core i5-3550 - 54 vs 77 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.7/FPS
15.882352941176473%
Price, €
€271.89
15%
Buy for €271.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3729 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.27/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
96.40062597809077%
Multi-Core
1051
55.4324894514768%
Intel Core i5-3550 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |