Buy on Amazon
€271.89
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $194
Availability
MSRP in USD: $194
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3550 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3550 is 200 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-6100 - 168 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-3550 - $21.68 vs $244.95
- Up to 91% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-3550 - $0.14 vs $1.62 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550 - 6 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-3550
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
168
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.62/FPS
8.641975308641976%
Price, €
€271.89
8%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-3550 Quad-Core Processor 3.3 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53550
Buy for €271.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
167
99.40476190476191%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.06
100%
Value Winner
for AMD CPU FX Series FX-6100 Six Core CPU 3.3GHz Socket AM3+ Processor
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-3550
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3550 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.