Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms Core i5-3475S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3869 days newer than Core i5-3475S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3475S
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 16% better in World of Tanks than Core i5-3475S - 590 vs 508 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3475S - 32 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
590
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€666.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €666.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3475S | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |