Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i5-3470S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2890 days newer than Core i5-3470S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470S
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3470S - 125 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470S - 20 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €202.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2420 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
604
34.2597844583097%
Multi-Core
1724
18.833296919379507%
Intel Core i5-3470S | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |