Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 4238 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $43.14 vs $153.54
- Up to 69% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-14400F - $0.28 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Deathloop than Core i5-3470 - 192 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 16 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
169
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€47.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €47.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16089 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
31%
Price, €
€170.43
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €170.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16088 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |