Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2517 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $43.14 vs $98.86
- Up to 51% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-9100F - $0.31 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3470 - 174 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 65 vs 77 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
155
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€47.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €47.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
49%
Price, €
€109.73
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €109.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |