Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2315 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $43.14 vs $506.05
- Up to 91% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $0.31 vs $3.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Halo Infinite than Core i5-3470 - 159 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 24 vs 4 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
153
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€47.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €47.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.53/FPS
8%
Price, €
€561.72
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €561.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |