Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900 is 3537 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-12900 - $62.88 vs $301.2
- Up to 77% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-12900 - $0.28 vs $1.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900
- Performs up to 9% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i5-3450S - 274 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 24 vs 4 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
251
91.6058394160584%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €69.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3677 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
274
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.22/FPS
22.95081967213115%
Price, €
€334.33
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €334.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3686 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
23.615042458552367%
Multi-Core
1681
12.88715118061944%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | Intel Core i9-12900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |