Buy on Amazon
€69.8
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1915 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 74% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $62.88 vs $244.95
- Up to 73% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 3 1200 - $0.6 vs $2.19 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1200 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3450S - 124 vs 117 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
117
94.35483870967742%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69.8
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-3450S Quad-Core Processor 2.8 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53450S
Buy for €69.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.19/FPS
27.397260273972602%
Price, €
€271.89
25%
FPS Winner
acer Chromebook Plus 514 Laptop with Google AI – 14" WUXGA 1920 x 1200 IPS Touch Display | AMD Ryzen 3 7320C | 8GB LPDDR5X | 128GB eMMC | Wi-Fi 6E | FHD Camera | Chrome OS | CB514-3HT-R8RB
Buy for €271.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3450S
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
59.34959349593496%
Multi-Core
1681
59.31545518701482%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.