Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4271 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $69.47 vs $447.82
- Up to 78% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-14900 - $0.5 vs $2.32 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 38% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3450 - 214 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 32 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
155
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10808 minutes ago
Buy for €497.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10820 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |