Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $69.47 vs $182.06
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-3450 - 173 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 20 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77715 minutes ago
Buy for €202.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77716 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
34.20306296086217%
Multi-Core
1781
19.45597552982303%
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |