Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 2164 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $43.14 vs $218.59
- Up to 77% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-8700T - $0.1 vs $0.44 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 19% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-3450 - 548 vs 461 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 35 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 12 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
461
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€47.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €47.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15849 minutes ago
Buy for €242.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15850 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |