Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $25.56 vs $71.3
- Up to 59% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i5-10400F - $0.18 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i5-3450 - 178 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 12 vs 4 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
159
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€28.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €28.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
40%
Price, €
€79.14
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €79.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |