Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 1220 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3900 - 171 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - $29.18 vs $69.47
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 51 vs 77 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77611 minutes ago
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77611 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
96.35157545605307%
Multi-Core
992
55.699045480067376%
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |