Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2766 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - $69.47 vs $355.32
- Up to 77% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 9 3950X - $0.5 vs $2.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 77 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 17% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3450 - 182 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 32 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
155
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€77.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €77.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4132 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.17/FPS
23%
Price, €
€394.41
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €394.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |