Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 is 735 days newer than Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-3330 - 156 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
146
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7673 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |