Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - $77.87 vs $186.45
- Up to 49% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-10900KF - $0.94 vs $1.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-3330 - 113 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 20 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €86.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.83/FPS
51%
Price, €
€206.96
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €206.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |