Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3775 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $78.17 vs $658.06
- Up to 86% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-13400F - $0.56 vs $4.01 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 17% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-3330 - 182 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
155
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.01/FPS
13%
Price, €
€730.45
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €730.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |