Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $77.87 vs $131.6
- Up to 13% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-11600K - $0.55 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 46% better in Rust than Core i5-3330 - 231 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
158
68%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17734 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
87%
Price, €
€146.08
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |