Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3330 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $77.87 vs $105.07
- Up to 21% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-10600K - $0.31 vs $0.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 77 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 9% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-3330 - 300 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 12 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
276
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €86.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17951 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
300
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
79%
Price, €
€116.63
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for €116.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17952 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |