Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3330 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1823 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3330.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Up to 3% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $77.87 vs $80.42
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 77 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 4% better in The Outer Worlds than Core i5-3330 - 202 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 16 vs 4 threads
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €86.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13181 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
96%
FPS Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |