Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-3330 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-3330 is 50 days older than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Performs up to 2% better in Rust than FX-8350 - 158 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than FX-8350 - $77.87 vs $135.27
- Up to 43% better value when playing Rust than FX-8350 - $0.55 vs $0.97 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €86.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17924 minutes ago
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17924 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |