Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3330 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3330 is 189 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than FX-6200 - 112 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-3330 - $31.32 vs $77.87
- Up to 58% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-3330 - $0.32 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 6 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €86.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Buy for €34.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |