Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3330 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3330 is 327 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-6100 - 456 vs 436 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i5-3330 - $21.68 vs $80.43
- Up to 70% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-3330 - $0.06 vs $0.2 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 6 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €89.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
436
95.6140350877193%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€24.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €24.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3330 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |