Buy on Amazon
€257.05
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $359
Availability
MSRP in USD: $359
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Core i5-3230M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3655 days newer than Core i5-3230M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3230M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Apex Legends than Core i5-3230M - 300 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3230M - 24 vs 4 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-13700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
300
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€257.05
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-13700F Desktop Processor 16 cores (8 P-cores + 8 E-cores) 30MB Cache, up to 5.2 GHz
Buy for €257.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57590 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-3230M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Core i7-13700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3230M
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Single-Core
510
19.165727170236753%
Multi-Core
1026
6.63004846526656%
Intel Core i5-3230M | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.