Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i5-2540M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3990 days newer than Core i5-2540M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2540M
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2540M - 179 vs 152 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2540M | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |