Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2540M outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2540M is 1034 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2540M
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1820 - 449 vs 448 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
448
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.67
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 243 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2540M | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |