Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i5-2540M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2403 days newer than Core i5-2540M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2540M
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than Core i5-2540M - 705 vs 675 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2540M - 16 vs 4 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
705
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.27
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €89.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2540M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |