Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 4747 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $219.35 vs $270.23
- Up to 8% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-14700F - $1.67 vs $1.82 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Dead Space than Core i5-2500K - 165 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 28 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
146
88%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€243.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €243.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
165
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.82/FPS
91%
Price, €
€299.95
81%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |