Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500K
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - $18.27 vs $178.04
- Up to 87% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-13500 - $0.13 vs $0.99 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 28% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2500K - 200 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 20 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
156
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
13.131313131313133%
Price, €
€197.62
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €197.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Single-Core
646
26.88306283811902%
Multi-Core
1921
15.559695447918354%
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |