Buy on Amazon
€243.48
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3719 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 16% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-2500K - 185 vs 160 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-2500K - $65.77 vs $219.35
- Up to 74% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-2500K - $0.39 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500K - 8 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
INTEL Core i5-2500K Processor - BX80623i52500K
Buy for €243.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3 (10th Gen) i3-10105 Quad-core (4 Core) 3.70 GHz Processor - Retail Pack
Buy for €73.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-2500K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500K | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.