Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 476 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-3770 - $18.24 vs $89.23
- Up to 79% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-3770 - $0.13 vs $0.63 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2500 - 156 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2500 - 8 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
154
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10107 minutes ago
Buy for €99.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |