Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2500 is 603 days older than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-3240T - 154 vs 151 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-2500 - $18.79 vs $142.07
- Up to 86% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-2500 - $0.14 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €157.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
151
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.86
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |