Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2500 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2641 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2500.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 4% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-2500 - 57 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-2500 - $49.74 vs $142.07
- Up to 66% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than Core i5-2500 - $0.97 vs $2.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €157.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
57
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |