Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2500 is 2186 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Performs up to 0% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G3930T - 239 vs 238 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-2500 - $28.52 vs $142.07
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €157.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75428 minutes ago
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75427 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
93.0390492359932%
Multi-Core
948
55.929203539823014%
Intel Core i5-2500 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |