Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i5-2467M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1553 days newer than Core i5-2467M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2467M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 17 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 4% better in Ready or Not than Core i5-2467M - 239 vs 229 FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2467M | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |