Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4245 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $33.63 vs $318.06
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 62% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-2405S - 732 vs 453 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €37.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76758 minutes ago
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76757 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Single-Core
535
19.5970695970696%
Multi-Core
1429
8.298972065741332%
Intel Core i5-2405S | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |