Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2272 days newer than Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-2405S - 239 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
239
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€190.73
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for €190.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Single-Core
535
45.57069846678024%
Multi-Core
1429
20.484518348623855%
Intel Core i5-2405S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |