Buy on Amazon
€37.33
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $229
Availability
MSRP in USD: $229
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2405S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2405S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2405S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - $33.63 vs $135.27
- Up to 72% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 5 2600X - $0.18 vs $0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 11% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i5-2405S - 230 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 12 vs 4 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Core i5-2405S
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
207
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.33
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2405S Quad-Core Processor 2.5 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52405S
Buy for €37.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
230
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
27%
Price, €
€150.15
24%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X Processor with Wraith Spire Cooler - YD260XBCAFBOX
Buy for €150.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Core i5-2405S
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Ryzen 5 2600X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2405S | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
|---|---|---|
| May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.