Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2405S outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2405S is 520 days older than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2405S
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6300 - 119 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 64% cheaper than FX-6300 - $33.63 vs $93.62
- Up to 65% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6300 - $0.31 vs $0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2405S - 6 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €37.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Buy for €103.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2405S | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |