Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 4279 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $51.18 vs $335.73
- Up to 84% better value when playing Control than Core i9-13900K - $0.29 vs $1.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Control than Core i5-2400S - 208 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 32 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
199
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.79/FPS
16%
Price, €
€372.66
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €372.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |