Buy on Amazon
€56.81
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $138
Availability
MSRP in USD: $138
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3250 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3250 is 882 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Core i5-2400S - 157 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-2400S - $41.2 vs $51.18
- Up to 19% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-2400S - $0.29 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 55 vs 65 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i5-2400S Quad-Core Processor 2.5 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400S
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13476 minutes ago
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
157
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3250 3.50GHz 2 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33250
Buy for €45.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13476 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.