Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 4378 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-13100 - $51.18 vs $98.69
- Up to 19% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-13100 - $0.13 vs $0.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 49% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-2400S - 668 vs 449 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 8 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
449
67%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
Buy for €109.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |