Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 596 days older than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-4130 - 155 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-2400S - $16.76 vs $51.18
- Up to 68% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-2400S - $0.12 vs $0.37 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10305 minutes ago
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10305 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |