Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700KF is 4664 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-14700KF - $58.99 vs $274.73
- Up to 75% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-14700KF - $0.51 vs $2.03 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700KF
- Performs up to 17% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-2400 - 150 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 28 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
128
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€65.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €65.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.03/FPS
25%
Price, €
€304.95
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €304.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |