Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $25.56 vs $131.6
- Up to 78% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600K - $0.15 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 13% better in Valheim than Core i5-2400 - 214 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 12 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
190
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€28.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €28.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15402 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
22%
Price, €
€146.08
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15402 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |