Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $25.56 vs $102.37
- Up to 71% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-11600 - $0.18 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 15% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-2400 - 179 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
155
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€28.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €28.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19229 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
179
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
28%
Price, €
€113.63
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |