Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - $25.56 vs $134.54
- Up to 79% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11500 - $0.22 vs $1.06 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 10% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-2400 - 141 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
128
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€28.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €28.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18740 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
20%
Price, €
€149.34
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for €149.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18741 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |